By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Council votes to use COVID funds on garbage fee subsidy
garbage fees

Turlock residents will get a five-year break on paying higher garbage fees as the Turlock City Council decided in a split vote on Tuesday to spend $4.7 million of American Rescue Plan Act funds on subsiding the fee increase.

The Council voted in February for garbage fees to increase as of April 1 to offset new state-mandated requirements calling on municipalities to help reduce California’s organic waste by 75% in the next three years. The resulting changes contributed to Turlock Scavenger increasing fees for the first time in six years. 

Knowing that Turlockers have been feeling the brunt of recent inflation in all areas of their budgets, the Council has been discussing ways to lighten the burden, for the short-term at least.

On Tuesday, Turlock Finance Director Isaac Moreno laid out four options for the Council to consider in temporarily reducing the garbage fees. Two of options would reduce the franchise fee (the amount of money the City charges residents to manage the contract with Turlock Scavenger) to 5% and 10% over the next five years. The other two options saw the City spending federal COVID relief funds (ARPA) on subsidizing the fees over the next five years.

American Rescue Plan Act funds can be used by the City to assist households, small businesses, nonprofits and industries negatively impacted economically by the pandemic. The City can also use Rescue Plan Act funds to invest in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure.

The Council has already spent ARPA funds to help with staffing shortages in public safety and other City departments, incentivize locals to shop and eat local and, most recently, to create a business development and assistance program.

While the majority of the Council approved spending ARPA funds on the garbage fee subsidy for every customer, Councilmembers Andrew Nosrati and Nicole Larson were against it, along with a couple of residents who spoke out during public comment.

Ron Bridegroom and other residents were not in favor of using ARPA funds for the temporary garbage fee subsidies, but would rather see the one-time funding be used on capital projects like Columbia Pool, or other permanent parks projects, or to add funds to the RAD card so customers and local business owners could benefit.

The dissenters would rather have seen the City lower the franchise fee.

“To me, the five of you are the policy makers. One of the fundamental policy questions here, I would think, is does the City subsidize some or all of the garbage billing? The other possibility is does the City make money off of the garbage? And I think it would be very simple for the policy makers to say ‘no, the City is going to cover its costs and that’s all its going to do. We’re not going to have an underhand, invisible tax on people and make money that way,’” Bridegroom said.

“Are we, as an organization, going to absorb the cuts or are we going have the residents pay it?” asked Nosrati.

“I think we could make bigger impact if we made it a general low-income and medium-income assist program and include monies already allocated towards the senior discount and just have it low-income,” said Councilmember Larson.

Mayor Amy Bublak said that having a low-income subsidy program would create more administrative costs and she wanted something that would benefit every resident of Turlock.

“Here’s this opportunity where we’re all facing, all of us, are facing whatever the costs are going up. And we’re going to face it for the next couple of years, we know that. Inflation’s coming, we can’t hide it. So, to have something that is going to reach everyone is the only fair thing to do. It’s not about if you have money or don’t. (The City of Turlock finance department) has nine and half people working utility bills right now. If we start and go, ‘statistically, we want to do it for only people at this…income,’ then you’re going to have to hire more people, then what have we done? We’ve wasted more money to figure out if we’ve achieved it. If we just try and make a gesture with the money that came because of COVID, and everyone one of us was touched negatively by it, we do make some gesture. It’s not forever, but it is something,” said Bublak.

 

Costa, Gray propose congressional bill to address critical physician shortage in rural areas
Costa and Gray
San Joaquin Valley congressional members Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, left, and Rep. Adam Gray, D-Merced, are shown discussing their bill H.R. 2106 in a virtual press conference on Tuesday.

BY TIM SHEEHAN

CV Journalism Collaborative

Two San Joaquin Valley congressional representatives have introduced a bill that could help address the vast shortage of doctors in the region, particularly in underserved areas. 

Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, and Rep. Adam Gray, D-Merced, say the Medical Education Act would, if passed, establish a program of grants to support expanded medical education programs in underserved areas of the nation.

The Valley could be one of the key areas that would benefit from the legislation. California has about 90 primary care doctors per 100,000 residents statewide, the federal Health Resources & Services Administration reported in November 2024. 

That’s more than the ratio in some states, and less than some others. The nationwide ratio is about 84 doctors per 100,000 residents.

But in the San Joaquin Valley, home to about 4.3 million people, doctors are much more scarce – about 47 primary care physicians per 100,000 residents, according to Dr. Tom Utecht, chief medical officer at the Fresno-based Community Health System.

That number is “a little over half of what is necessary to take care of a population,” Utecht said Tuesday in a video press conference. “We have the lowest physicians-per-capita rate in all of California, in the San Joaquin Valley.”

Introduced last month, the Medical Education Act is something of a placeholder for the time being until the Congressional Research Service can weigh in with financial estimates of what is needed in different parts of the country, Costa said. 

A companion version was introduced in March in the U.S. Senate by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-West Virginia, and Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Los Angeles.

At this point, the legislation does not specify how much money will ultimately be sought or how grants would be structured.

Costa said the shortage of doctors in the region “is combined with language barriers, cultural barriers and distances … and that would really go for rural parts of our country regardless where folks live.”

“If you live in rural areas, it’s just more difficult to have access to good quality health care,” he added.

Costa said the legislation, if it can survive a Republican-controlled House and Senate and a Republican president, “would be transformative because it would invest expanded resources to minority-serving institutions and colleges located in rural and underserved areas to establish schools of medicine and osteopathic medicine.”

The bill would also create an avenue for more historically Black colleges and universities, as well as Hispanic-serving institutions, to establish medical education programs, Costa said.

Gray noted that when he was in the state Legislature, he and colleagues “worked to get hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to expand the UC Merced campus, to ultimately secure the funding to put the first medical education building up on campus.”

Gray added that the UC San Francisco’s medical education program in Fresno “is an important part of creating the (medical) workforce of the future for the valley, but more importantly, solving this access to care issue that plagues Valley communities.”

At UC Merced, director of medical education Dr. Margo Vener said there has been a surge of interest in the university’s program that funnels students through an undergraduate program for their bachelor of science degree through a medical school degree in collaboration with UC San Francisco.

“All the students that we are enrolling are from the Valley and for the Valley, because they want to really make a difference in promoting health in their communities,” Vener said. That, she added, is likely to eventually translate to those would-be doctors to stay in the Valley to practice medicine.

“The data suggests that two factors really strongly influence where physicians stay to practice,” Vener said. “One of them is where they’re from, which, of course, is why we’re recruiting students from the Valley for the Valley just to stay (and) be doctors for their community. And the other factor is where you went to residency. Those are the two biggest drivers.”

That’s something that was underscored by Dr. Kenny Banh, assistant dean of undergraduate education at UCSF Fresno. “Regional campuses such as UC Merced and UCSF Fresno not only grow doctors, but they take those doctors, physicians and medical students from their communities in the region, and train them in those regions to go back to be physicians in those areas,” he said.

While the costs of the Costa-Gray legislation are yet to be determined, Banh said there are also costs associated with doing nothing to expand medical education.

“There’s health care costs, regardless of how we work it, if we don’t invest in having an adequate supply of physicians,” Banh said. “There’s a cost on the human that can’t access care” and doesn’t get to a doctor until a condition is not treatable “or with significantly worse morbidity and mortality outcomes.”

“And that cost is borne by health systems taxpayers, one way or the other,” Banh added.

But even if the Costa-Gray bill were to pass in this congressional session, the payoff of home-grown medical schools producing a bumper crop of physicians in the Valley or other deprived parts of the country would be years down the road.

“I think it’s really important to understand why we need to invest now for our future, because it takes so darn long” for a student to go from being a college freshman to a practicing doctor, surgeon or specialist, UC Merced’s Vener said. 

After a four-year bachelor’s degree, a student must then complete four years of medical school, which in turn is followed by a residency of three to five years.

“Then often people will do a fellowship to become, for example, a cardiologist or a gastroenterologist or something like that,” she added.

“If you start investing in just one student now, it’s going to take such a long time before they really are there to take care of you at that moment when you need them to be your gastroenterologist, your cardiologist, your emergency physician, or, dare I say, your family doctor,” Vener said.

That, she said, is why it’s also necessary to expand residency programs that can attract would-be physicians into the region in hopes that they will remain once they complete their training. “We need those doctors now, and that’s why this effort is important,” Vener said, “because this is what will both inspire people to stay, but also inspire people to really come and embrace the communities and serve them.”

In a related development, state Assemblymember Esmeralda Soria, D-Fresno, recently introduced a bill for the University of California system to develop a comprehensive funding plan for expanding the current SJV Prime+ BS-to-MD partnership between UC San Francisco and UC Merced, with the goal of transitioning the program to a fully independent medical school operated by UC Merced.

“We have seen firsthand the impacts of medical workforce shortages throughout the Central Valley,” Soria said in a prepared statement. “AB 58 would help ensure the Legislature is equipped with the information needed to secure appropriate funding for the medical education provided for our community at UC Merced.”

— Tim Sheehan is the Health Care Reporting Fellow at the nonprofit Central Valley Journalism Collaborative. The fellowship is supported by a grant from the Fresno State Institute for Media and Public Trust. Contact Sheehan at tim@cvlocaljournalism.org.